This High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail filed by an accused charged under IPC sections for voluntary intentionally causing hurt. The Court held that the nature of the injury sustained by the de facto complainant did not justify relief.
Application dismissed; applicant directed to surrender and seek regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1940
CRIME NO. 396/2018 OF IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION , TRISSUR
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED
ARUN, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.MULALI, KAREKKATTIL HOUSE, AMBALANADA, PULLUR VILLAGE, PULLUR DESOM, TRICHUR DISTRICT. BY ADV.SRI.VISHNUPRASAD NAIR RESPONDENT(S)/STATE: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. (CRIME NO.396/2018 OF IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT)
BY SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.N.PRABHAKARAN
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
IAP
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, J.
B.A. No.4091 of 2018
Dated this the 27th day of June, 2018
ORDER
B.A.No.4091 of 2018 2
This application is dismissed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE
IAP //True Copy\ P.A to Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case of voluntary injury and quashing of motor cycle by the accused overprevious enmity.
Whether the severity of injuries inflicted and attendant facts justify granting anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Arun
State of Kerala
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
