Shamshad v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Court directed petitioner to surrender within ten days instead of granting immediate bail. Petitioner faces charges for injuring complainant with a sword and illegal weapon possession. Surrender required for investigation and seizure of weapon.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to surrender before Investigating Officer within ten days for interrogation and weapon seizure.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
THURSDAY ,THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 1987 of 2018
PETITIONER/:
SHAMSHAD AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.SHAFEEQ, KOCHUVEEDU, POTHANCODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.
... SRI.N.SUNIL JOSEPH
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA-682031, REPRESENTING THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POTHANCODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695584.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant bail or direct surrender in a case involving injuries caused with a sword.
Whether the weapon used in the offense should be recovered.
Whether the previous involvement in other cases affects the bail decision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHAMSHAD
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
SUNIL THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court