Four anticipatory bail applications filed by Abdul Najeab regarding cheating charges were dismissed. The single-judge bench found no compelling reason to grant pre-arrest bail since the final report had been submitted to the court.
No bail granted; applicant directed to seek regular bail from the jurisdictional court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 24TH ASWINA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 1633 of 2018
CRIME NO. 291/2017 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
ABDUL NAJEEB, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. USUF, KAPOOR HOUSE, TALEKODE P.O, MALAPPURAM - 679 341.
BY ADVS. SRI.SALIM V.S. SRI.H.NUJUMUDEEN
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 031.
SRI C N PRABHAKARAN, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.10.2018, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..1704/2018, Bail Appl..1672/2018, Bail Appl..1637/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.As.1633, 1637, 1672 & 1704/18
2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 24TH ASWINA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 1637 of 2018
CRIME NO. 289/2017 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
ABDUL NAJEEB, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. USUF, KAPOOR HOUSE, TALEKODE P.O., MALAPPURAM -679341.
BY ADV. SRI.SALIM V.S.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031.
SRI C N PRABHAKARAN, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.10.2018, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..1704/2018, Bail Appl..1672/2018, Bail Appl..1633/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.As.1633, 1637, 1672 & 1704/18
3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 24TH ASWINA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 1672 of 2018
CRIME NO. 290/2017 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
ABDUL NAJEEB, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. USUF, KAPOOR HOUSE, TALEKODE P.O, MALAPPURAM - 679 341.
BY ADVS. SRI.SALIM V.S. SRI.H.NUJUMUDEEN
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 031.
SRI AJITH MURALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.10.2018, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..1704/2018, Bail Appl..1637/2018 AND Bail Appl..1633/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.As.1633, 1637, 1672 & 1704/18
4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 24TH ASWINA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 1704 of 2018
CRIME NO. 292/2017 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
ABDUL NAJEEB, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.USUF, KAPOOR HOUSE, THALEKODE P.O., MALAPPURAM-679341.
BY ADVS. SRI.SALIM V.S. SRI.H.NUJUMUDEEN
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.10.2018, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..1672/2018, Bail Appl..1637/2018 AND Bail Appl..1633/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.As.1633, 1637, 1672 & 1704/18
5
ORDER
These applications are filed under §438 of the Cr.P.C.
B.As.1633, 1637, 1672 & 1704/18
6
final report has been laid before the jurisdictional court.
merits.
These applications are dismissed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE
DSV/16/10/18
//True Copy// P.A.To Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted where the final report has been laid and no compelling reason exists.
Whether the applicant should be directed to appear for regular bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ABDUL NAJEEB
STATE OF KERALA
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
