Ismail E.R v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court rejected anticipatory bail application for an accused officer alleged to have aided a cheating conspiracy. Court found prima facie materials against the petitioner and refused bail, directing expeditious surrender.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; no directions for surrender issuance; petitioner to surrender and file bail application on merits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1939 Bail Appl..No. 1178 of 2018
(CRIME NO. 1463/2017 OF TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, TRISSUR)
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
ISMAIL E.R., S/O. RAHIM, AGED 54 YEARS, ERAMBATH HOUSE, MANIYARAMKUDI POST, IDUKKI.
BY ADV.SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THRISSUR TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. SAJJU S.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the accused who is alleged to have actively aided in a cheating conspiracy.
Whether the available materials prima facie indicate definite involvement of the petitioner in the offence.
Whether the gravity of allegations warrants refusal of discretionary bail under Section 438 CrPC.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ismail E.R.
- respondent
State
Coram
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court