Bhargavi v. the Union of India and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petitioner is deceased. Recording counsel's submission, the Hon'ble Court closed the writ petition without delivering a substantive judgment or disposal order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017/28TH BHADRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 9632 of 2010 (D)
PETITIONER:
BHARGAVI., W/O. KOCHAYYAPPAN GANGADHARAN, AGED 72,PANACKAL,CHARAMANGALAM,MUHAMMA.P.O, CHERTHALA.
BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI.
2. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,GENERAL, ADMINISTRATION,DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BHARGAVI, W/O. KOCHAYYAPPAN GANGADHARAN
- respondent
THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL, ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court