The High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed because the petitioner's counsel explicitly stated that the petitioner did not wish to pursue the matter during the hearing before dismissing it on the same day.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2017/1ST JYAISHTA, 1939
WP(C).No. 7532 of 2017 (N)
PETITIONER:
TOMY AUGUSTINE, S/O.AUGUSTINE, AGED 42 YEARS, CHERANILLATHUPUTHENPURA HOUSE, MANIYARA P.O., KONNATHADY VILLAGE, IDUKKI, PIN - 685 521.
BY ADV. SRI.T.S.RAJAN
RESPONDENT:
INDUSIND BANK LTD, REPRESENTED BY THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SHALOM TOWERS, 34/138 D, BY PASS NORTH END, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI - 682 024.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.PAULOCHAN ANTONY SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-05-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.V.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition. Taking note of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
sm/
TOMY AUGUSTINE
INDUSIND BANK LTD
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
