Dismissed
Eldho v. State of Kerala and Others
Kerala HCWP(C)/5778/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/15TH JYAISHTA, 1939
WP(C).No. 5778 of 2010 (V)
PETITIONER :
ELDHO, S/O.VARKEY, AGED 57 YEARS, KUNNATH HOUSE, VAKARA KARA, MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.S.JIJI
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION, PAINAVU, IDUKKI COLONY P.O.
2. THE SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, L.A.C. DEVIKULAM.
3. THE TAHSILDAR (LA), TALUK OFFICE, DEVIKULAM.
4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE, ADIMALI, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A.C.VIDHYA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
WP(C).No. 5778 of 2010 (V)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
| EXHIBIT P1 | COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO.235/93 DATED 27/9/1993 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT |
|---|---|
| EXHIBIT P2 | COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 1/3/1999 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT |
| EXHIBIT P3 | COPY OF THE B.T. RECEIPT DATED 25/9/2006 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT |
| EXHIBIT P4 | COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO.433/2007 DATED 14/2/2007 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT |
| EXHIBIT P5 | COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE JANAKEEYA ADALATH DATED 11/11/2008 |
| EXHIBIT P6 | COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 28/10/2009 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT |
| EXHIBIT P7 | COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 4/2/2010 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. |
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
W.P(C) No. 5778 of 2010 V
Dated this the 05th day of June, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner in this writ petition sought a re-
survey to be conducted. By sheer passage of time, the subject
matter is no more alive. If at all the petitioner still has a
grievance, he can approach the appropriate authority. Leaving
open the contentions, writ petition would stand closed.
Sd/-
jma
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) //true copy//
P.A to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking a re-survey remains alive after sheer passage of time.
Eldho
State of Kerala
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court