Thushara Shan v. the Mattanchery Mahajanik
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2017/3RD JYAISHTA, 1939
WP(C).No. 527 of 2016 (M)
PETITIONER:
THUSHARA SHAN,W/O.SHANKUMAR M.K., AGED 34 YEARS, MATTEL HOUSE, NEAR OORALLAKKAMSERRY TEMPLE, PERUPADAPPU, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI.
BY ADV. SMT.PRAISHEEL PRAKASAM
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE MATTANCHERY MAHAJANIK CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. NO.665, PALLIYARAKKAVU ROAD, KOCHI-682 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
2. AUTHORISED OFFICER, THE MATTANCHERRY MAHAJANIK CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.NO.665, PALLIYARAKKAVU ROAD, KOCHI-682 002.
BY ADVS SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-05-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 527 of 2016 (M)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
P1 : COPY OF RELEVANT PAGE OF RATION CARD OF THE PETITIONER.
P2 : COPY OF PAPER PUBLICATION IN MALAYALA MANORAMA NEWSPAPER DT 2-12-2015.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
mbr/
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
............................................................. W.P.(C).No.527 of 2016
............................................................. Dated this the 24nd day of May, 2017
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE
mns/24.05.17
//true copy//
P.A to Judge
THUSHARA SHAN
THE MATTANCHERY MAHAJANIK CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court