This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2017/11TH JYAISHTA, 1939
WP(C).No. 3758 of 2009 (V)
PETITIONER(S):
SABU THOMAS, PUTHEN PURACKAL, KALLARA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN
SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1.KALLARA (VAIKOM)GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KALLARA SOUTH P.O., VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM.
KALLARA (VAIKOM)GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KALLARA SOUTH P.O.
3.THE PRESIDENT, KALLARA (VAIKOM) GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KALLARA SOUTH P.O.
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM.
R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.K.SUNIL R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A.C. VIDHYA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
EL
WP(C).No. 3758 of 2009 (V)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
| P1 | TRUE COPY OF THE | TAX RECEIPT DATED 15.3.2007 |
|---|---|---|
| P2 | TRUE COPY OF THE PROPERTY |
SKETCH SHOWING THE LIE OF THE |
| P3 | TRUE COPY OF THE | RESOLUTION NO.I(G) DATED 28.03.2007 |
| P4 | TRUE COPY OF THE | RESOLUTION NO.II(A) DATED 19.5.07 |
| P5 | TRUE COPY OF THE | RESOLUTION NO.4(2) DATED 5.11.2007 |
| P6 | TRUE COPY OF THE | REPRESENTATION DATED 11.12.2008 |
| P7 | TRUE COPY OF THE PUBLISHED IN THE |
TENDER NOTIFICATION DT.27.12.2008 DESABHIMANI DAILY DT.30.12.08 |
| P8 | TRUE COPY OF THE | ROUGH SKETCH FOR SC TRAINING CENTRE |
| P9 | TRUE COPY OF THE | PHOTO GRAPHS SHOWING THE MARKERS |
| P10 | TRUE COPY OF THE | REPRESENTATION DATED 12.1.2009 |
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE
EL
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
W.P(C) No. 3758 of 2009 V
Dated this the 01st day of June, 2017 J U D G M E N T
The dispute was with respect to an access to a
property. The Panchayath was standing against such access
being given. After deliberations and mediations, the
Panchayath has taken a decision which is evidenced from
Ext.P11. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the Panchayath agrees that the matter can be settled on the basis of the decision taken by
the Panchayath. The operative portion of the decision is extracted herein:
çÎW ÕßÕøßºíº ØÞÙºøcBZ Éøß·ÃߺíºáæµÞIí, ºLMùOí (µßÝAí ÍÞ·¢) ÕØñáÕßæa Õ¿æA ¥ÄßøßW
ØíÅßÄß æºÏîáK ÉFÞÏJí ç×ÞMß¹í çµÞOïµíØßÈᢠ§¿ÏßÜâæ¿ ÉáJXÉáøAW ÕàGßW dÖàÎÄß çÎÞ{ß çÄÞÎØßçaÏᢠØÎàÉÕÞØßµ{ÞÏåÎxí µá¿á¢ÌB
WPC.No. 3758/2009
: 2 :
{áæ¿ÏᢠÉáøÏß¿B{ßçÜAí dÉçÕÖßAáKÄßÈá
¥ÈáçÏÞ¼cÎÞÏ ÕßÇJßW ÈÞÜí ÎàxV ÕàÄßÏßW ²øá ÕÝß ¥{Kí Äßøߺíºí æµÞ¿áAáKÄßÈá, ²øá æÉÞÄáÕÝß ®K ÈßÜÏßW ¥Äßøí µÜïß¿áKÄßÈᢠdÉØñáÄ ÕÝßÏáæ¿ ÕßÖÆÞ¢ÖBZ ÉFÞÏJßæa çùÞÁí ø¼ßØíxùßW çºVAáKÄßÈᢠÉFÞÏJí µNßxß æ®µµçIÈ ÄàøáÎÞÈߺíºá.
Writ petition is disposed of directing the
Panchayath to comply with the above decision as expeditiously
as possible.
Sd/-
jma
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) //true copy//
P.A to Judge
SABU THOMAS
KALLARA (VAIKOM)GRAMA PANCHAYATH
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
