Dismissed
Krishnendhu B.M.(Minor) v. Malabar Sahodaya Kalotsav Committee
Kerala HCWP(C)/36686/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/24TH KARTHIKA, 1939
WP(C).No. 36686 of 2017 (I)
PETITIONER:
KRISHNENDHU B.M.(MINOR),
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY HER MOTHER & GUARDIAN BINU. O, W/O. MANIKANDAN, OTHANGATH HOUSE, MOKAVOOR, ERANHIKKAL P.O, CALICUT-673303.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. MALABAR SAHODAYA KALOTSAV COMMITTEE, 2016-17, MALABAR REGION, MAR BASELIOS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL, ENGAPUZHA, PUTHUPPADI P.O., CALICUT, PIN-673586, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. CONFEDERATION OF KERALA, SAHODAYA SEVENS BUILDING, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN-686562, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3. REGIONAL OFFICER,
R3 BY ADV. SRI.NIRMAL S., SC,
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-11-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 36686 of 2017 (I)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF PARTICIPANTS. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MARK SHEET. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL -----------------------
K.V. P.S.TO JUDGE
K. Vinod Chandran, J
W.P.(C).No.36686 of 2017-I
Dated this the 15th day of November, 2017
JUDGMENT
In W.P.(C) No.35633 of 2017, seeking similar reliefs as
prayed for in this writ petition, this Court has held so, vide judgment dated 13.11.2017:
“3. The consortium of schools obviously carry on such Kalotsav to inculcate in the students, interest in the fine arts and to give a platform to the children inclined artistically to perform in a competitive environment. Undue significance to the competitions carried on need not be given especially since it does not in any manner influence the academic grades. There is also no reason to confer the competitions the colour of a legal battle with an appeal, revision and so on and so forth. This Court does not find any valid reason to invoke the extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to interfere in the conduct of a Kalotsav (art festival) which would denude it of a healthy competitive environment. There is also no question of grace marks being granted on the basis of the participation. This Court does not find any reason to interfere with the matter”.
Following the aforesaid view, this writ petition would stand
dismissed.
Sd/-
K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/-
[ true copy ]
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) No.35633 of 2017Followed¶29
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishnendhu B.M. (Minor) Represented by Binu
Malabar Sahodaya Kalotsav Committee
Confederation of Kerala
Regional Officer, Central Board of Secretary Education
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court