B.P. Bijesh v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The court was inclined to dismiss it with costs before the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No specific relief other than dismissal is granted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017/22ND BHADRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 27354 of 2017 (T) ----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
1. B.P. BIJESH, S/O.B.BABY, CHERUKUNNIL VEEDU, VELIYAM WEST P.O., VELIYAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
2. ANZAR A.B, S/O.ALIYARUKUNJU, ANSAR MANZIL, VAZHAPPARA, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT-689695.
BY ADVS.SRI.PREMCHAND R.NAIR SRI.GEORGE BRISTON SRI.V.P.PRASANTH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.P. BIJESH
- petitioner
ANZAR A.B
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, ROAD TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
- respondent
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court