Vamadean Bhanu v. Tahasildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his rights to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to the right to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/24TH KARTHIKA, 1939
WP(C).No. 2696 of 2017 (J)
PETITIONER:
VAMADEAN BHANU, AGED 66 YEARS,S/O.LATE K.BHANU, PALESSERIL HOUSE(VAMA BHAVAN), GOVINDAMUTTOM,PUTHUPALLY NORTH.P.O, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK-690 527, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JAYAMMA VAMADEVAN, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O.VAMADEVAN BHANU,PALESSERIL HOUSE(VAMA BHAVAN), GOVINDAMUTTOM, PUTHUPALLY NORTH.P.O, KARTHIKAPAALLY TALUK-690 527.
BY ADVS.SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1. TAHASILDAR, THALUK OFFICE, KARTHIKAPALLY-690 516.
2. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, THALUK OFFICE, KARTHIKAPPALLY-690 516.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VAMADEAN BHANU
- respondent
TAHASILDAR, THALUK OFFICE, KARTHIKAPALLY
- respondent
THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, THALUK OFFICE, KARTHIKAPPALLY
- respondent
THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICE, PUTHUPALLY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court