Anju S v. Federal Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction to Federal Bank to decide on an educational loan application submitted by the petitioner, citing lack of response to a notice.
What did the court decide?
Directing the first respondent to take a decision on the representation within two weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/19TH JYAISHTA, 1939
WP(C).No. 1944 of 2017 (P)
PETITIONER:
ANJU S, AGED 17 YEARS, D/O.SATHEESHKUMAR, MUPPATHIMOONIL CHIRA (H), NADUBHAGOM, CHAMPAKULAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA- 688 505, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER SHRI.SATHEESH KUMAR.
BY ADVS.SRI.VARUGHESE M EASO
SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J. SMT.JISEMOL THOMAS
SMT.FATHIMA RAZAK
RESPONDENTS:
1. FEDERAL BANK REPRESENTED BY IT’S BRANCH MANAGER, CHAMPAKULAM BRANCH, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the bank to decide on the petitioner's request for an educational loan.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anju S
- respondent
Federal Bank
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court