Dismissed

K.G.Sasidharan Pillai v. Kerala Forest Development Corporation

Kerala HC5 Apr 2017WP(C)/17905/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This brief judgment references the ratio of a contemporary disposition (W.P.(C) No. 17678 of 2011) to dispose of a petition concerning terminal benefits of a retired Divisional Manager. The Court directs the Corporation to refund any retained amounts within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed on same lines as W.P.(C) No. 17678 of 2011; order Ext.P6 set aside; refund of any retained terminal benefits within three months. Quality check: readable

K.G.Sasidharan Pillai Vs Kerala Forest… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/15TH CHAITHRA, 1939

¶5

WP(C).No. 17905 of 2011 (K)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

K.G.SHASIDHARAN PILLAI,DIVISIONAL

¶8

MANAGER(RTD), KERALA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, KOTTAYAM,RESIDING AT "SHEELAS",, MANJALOOR,PATHANAMPURAM.P.O,KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.DEEPU THANKAN

¶10

SMT.SONIA GEORGE

¶11

RESPONDENT(S):

¶12

KERALA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., AARANGAKONAM,KARAPUZHA, KOTTAYAM,

¶13

REPRESENTED BY, ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR-686 003.

¶14

STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTELD BY ITS

¶15

SECRETARY,FOREST AND WILD LIFE(D)DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶16

ACCOUNTANT GENERAL(AUDIT),KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶17

R2,R3 BY ADV. SMT. A.C. VIDHYA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER R BY SRI.V.G.ARUN R BY SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

WP(C).No. 17905 of 2011 (K)

¶20

: 2 :

¶21

APPENDIX

¶22

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶23

EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.09.1991.

¶24

EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE MANAGING DIRECTOR DATED 10.04.1996

¶25

EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT CORPORATION DATED 14.06.2000.

¶26

EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT CORPORATION DATED 24.09.2010.

¶27

EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 01.10.2010.

¶28

EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 26.03.2011.

¶29

EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION OF THE FIRST RESONDENT CORPORATION DATED 13.07.2006.

¶30

EXT.P8 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT CORPORATION DATED 10.07.2007.

¶31

EXT.P9 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE FIRST RESONDENT CORPORATION DATED 20.11.2008.

¶32

EXT.P10 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 22.06.2011 IN W.P.(C) NO. 16683/2011.

¶33

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

¶38

-------------------------------------------

¶39

W.P. (C) No. 17905 of 2011 ()

¶40

-----------------------------------------Dated this the 5^th day of April, 2017.

¶41

JUDGMENT

¶42

The issue involved in this case is similar to that in W.P.(C) No. 17678 of 2011, which was disposed of today by this Court. In the light of the ratio of the above judgment, this Court disposes of the writ petition on the same lines, thereby, setting aside Ext.P6.

¶43

Consequently, this Court directs that if the Corporation has retained any amount from the petitioner's terminal benefits, it should pay that amount back to the petitioner at the earliest, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶44

sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

¶45

¶46

W.P.(C.) No. -2-

K.G.Sasidharan Pillai v. Kerala Forest Development Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.G.Sasidharan Pillai v. Kerala Forest Development Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prof. V.M. Aniyan Vs the University of Calicut, Represented by the Registrar

Vinod Kumar P.R. Vs Range Forest Officer

Kudumbi Educational Society Vs the Union of India

Santhakumari a Vs State of Kerala

P.N.Bhanuvikraman Nair Vs Kerala Forest Development Corporation

M.Jojo Jacob Vs Kerala Forest Development Corporation