Valli Ramanan v. Government of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The court granted permission to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to their right to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
The court granted permission to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to their right to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2017/26TH ASHADHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 14543 of 2016 (p) ----------------------------
PETITIONERS:
| 1. |
VALLI RAMANAN, WIFE OF VENKAT RAMANAN, AGED 62 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX, HARITHA AGRI-AGENCIES, METTUPPALAYAM STREET, PALAKKAD. |
|---|---|
| 2. |
P.APPUKUTTAN, S/O.E.PONNU, AGED 65 YEARS, KRISHNA HARDWARES, COURT ROAD, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. |
| 3. |
M.SHAIK MUSTAFA, SON OF N.MOIDEN SHAIK, AGED 46 YEARS, P.N.M.STORES, KUTTIPADAM, MUTHALAMADA.P.O., PALAKKAD. |
| 4. |
M.P.SUNILKUMAR, SON OF UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 40 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, S.K.AGRI-AGENCIES, NATTUKAL.P.O., MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD. |
| 5. |
V.RAJAN., SON OF VELAYUDHAN, AGED 66 YEARS, T.V.R. AGENCIES, MUTHALAMADA, PALAKKAD. |
| 6. |
V.A.MOHAMMED BASHEER, SON OF HAMZA, AGED 49 YEARS, MALABAR AGENCIES, CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD. |
| 7. |
V.THIRUNEELAKANDAN, SON OF VELAYUDHAN, AGED 56 YEARS, HIGH RANGE CHEMICALS BY PASS ROAD, VALLANGHY, NENMMARA.P.O., PALAKKAD. |
| 8. |
TOMY JOSEPH, SON OF JOSEPH, AGED 46 YEARS, UNITED TRADERS, MAIN ROAD, NEMMARA, PALAKKAD. |
| 9. |
M.UNNIKRISHNAN, SON OF MADHAVAN, AGED 49 YEARS, SREENATH AGENCIES, GRAMAPEEDIKA, KODUVAYUR, PALAKKAD. |
| BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN |
WP(C).No. 14543 of 2016 (p)
RESPONDENTS:
1. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMER'S WELFARE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CO-OPERATION AND FARMERSWELFARE, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE (E & T), PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICE, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
R1 BY ADV. SMT.SREEKALA K.L., CGC R3 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K. J MANURAJ R BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 14543 of 2016 (p)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
| EXHIBIT | P1 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE IST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXHIBIT | P2 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE 2ND |
| EXHIBIT | P3 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE 3RD |
| EXHIBIT | P4 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE 4TH |
| EXHIBIT | P5 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE 5TH |
| EXHIBIT | P6 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE 6TH |
| EXHIBIT | P7 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE 7TH |
| EXHIBIT | P8 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE 8TH |
| EXHIBIT | P9 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER. |
OF THE | LICENSES RELATING TO THE 9TH |
| EXHIBIT | P10 | A TRUE COPY AS IT STOOD |
OF RUL PRIOR T |
E 10 OF THE INSECTICIDES RULES, O THE AMENDMENT. |
| EXHIBIT | P11 | A TRUE COPY 2015 ISSUED |
OF THE BY THE |
NOTIFICATION DATED NOVEMBER 5, IST RESPONDENT. |
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT R3(A) A TRUE COPY OF GAZETTE NOTIFICATION
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
bng
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
W.P.(C) No.14543 of 2016
Dated this the 17th day of July, 2017
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
JUDGE
bpr
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
VALLI RAMANAN
P.APPUKUTTAN
M.SHAIK MUSTAFA
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court