M. Abdul Jabbar v. Deputy Tahasildhar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/29TH JYAISHTA, 1939
WP(C).No. 13560 of 2017 (T)
PETITIONER :
-----------
M. ABDUL JABBAR, FATHIMA MANZIL, KALLUVILA,PALAMKONAM.P.O,KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.B.GANGESH
SMT.SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH
SMT.ATHIRA A.MENON
RESPONDENTS :
-----------
1. DEPUTY TAHASILDHAR, TALUK OFFICE,KOTTARAKARA-691506.
2. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHITHARA VILLAGE OFFICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691559.
3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE,KOLLAM,PIN-691001.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI. SURIN GEORGE IPYE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 13560 of 2017 (T)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
| EXHIBIT P1: | TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.251/91 DATED 27.6.1994 |
|---|---|
| EXHIBIT P2: | TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE IN O.S.251/91 DATED 217-6-1994 |
| EXHIBIT P3: | TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 13/7/2011 |
| EXHIBIT P4: | TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C)NO.26216/2011 DATED 3.10.2011 |
| EXHIBIT P5: | TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C)16022/2014 DATED 25.6.2014. |
| EXHIBIT P6: | TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 9.6.2015 PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. |
| EXHIBIT P7: | TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 15.7.2015 |
| EXHIBIT P8: | TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 18.12.2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. |
| RESPONDENT(S)' | EXHIBITS : NIL. |
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.13560 of 2017
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 19th day of June, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition concerns the inaction on the part of the first respondent in implementing Ext.P8 appellate order passed by the third respondent under the Transfer of Registry Rules.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is closed recording the submission made by the learned Government Pleader.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE
rsr
M. Abdul Jabbar
Deputy Tahasildhar, Taluk Office, Kottarakkara
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court