Unaisa Jamhar v. M/S Sundaram Bnp Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was closed as the parties submitted that the matter had been settled between them.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/
WP(C).No. 11273 of 2017 (H)
PETITIONER(S):
1. UNAISA JAMHAR MUKULAMPURUTH HOUSE, KALPPETTA, KAKKAVAYAL, WAYANAD (DIST).
2. SUBAIDA
- KAIPOORA ESTATE, MEPPADI PO, WAYANAD.
3. SHIHABUDHEEN .A KAIPOORA ESTATE, MEPPADI (PO), WAYANAD.
BY ADVS.SMT.CELINE JOSEPH SMT.V.C.ARCHANA
RESPONDENT:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Unaisha Jamhar Mukulampuorth House Kalketta, Kakkavayal, Wayanad, etc.
- petitioner
Subaida Kaipoola Estate
- petitioner
Shihabudheen A Kaipoola Estate
- respondent
M/s Sundaram BNP Finance Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court