Davis P K v. Authorised Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition regarding a property dispute and auction purchase, the High Court closed the petition upon recording a memorandum of agreement settled through mediation under Section 89 CrPC between the petitioner and the bank.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed upon recording the memorandum of agreement settled through mediation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/23RD SRAVANA, 1939
WP(C).No. 10463 of 2015 (G)
PETITIONER :
DAVIS P.K., AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.KOCHAPPAN, PAROKKARAN HOUSE, SOUTH CHEMPANNOR, ANGAMALY SOUTH, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. AUTHORIZED OFFICER, HDFC BANK LTD, S.L.PLAZA, PALARIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 025.
- *2. JOSHY JOSEPH,
MANIYATT HOUSE, MAMANGALAM CROSS ROAD, DEEPAM LANE, EDAPPALLY P.O, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 025. [DELETED]
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be closed upon recording of the settlement agreement reached through mediation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DAVIS P.K.
- respondent
AUTHORIZED OFFICER, HDFC BANK LTD
Coram
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court