The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Intelligence) v. Suresh a.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a writ petition disposal ordering vehicle release upon redemption fee remittance. Court held adjudication ongoing, unnecessary to decide on merits, and disposed of appeal leaving contentions open.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2017/16TH ASHADHA, 1939
WA.No. 201 of 2016 () IN WP(C).783/2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 783/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 08-01-2016
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC:
- THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE) COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD 678 001.
- THE COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR 678 624.
BY ADV. SRI. MOHAMMED RAFIQ, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal requires decision on merits when the subject matter has already been resolved below.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Intelligence) Commercial Taxes Department, Palakkad
- appellant
The Commercial Tax Inspector Commercial Tax Check Post, Walayar
- respondent
Suresh A.
- respondent
Venkatchalam C.
- respondent
Raja V
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court