Ramesan V.C. v. Abdul Majeed P.M.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the withdrawal application and the writ appeal as withdrawn by the appellant, who had delayed filing the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal and application to condone delay dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/26TH KARTHIKA, 1939
WA.No. 1631 of 2013 ()
-----------------------------WP(C) 29671/2012 of THIS HON'BLE COURT
APPELLANT/5TH RESPONDENT :
RAMESAN V.C. S/O.CHATTAN,VENGASSERY HOUSE, PULIKUTTYMADOM ROAD,IRINJAKUDA VILLAZGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT-680121.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 1 TO 5 AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RAMESAN V.C.
- respondent
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
Coram
P.N. RAVINDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court