K.v.Raghavan v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal and application to condone delay in filing a writ appeal were dismissed because no sufficient ground for condonation was stated and the original prayer was already granted.
What did the court decide?
Petition for condonation of delay discharged; Appellants' appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2017/13TH ASHADHA, 1939
WA.No. 1366 of 2017 IN WP(C).41147/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 41147/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 12-01-2017
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
K.V.RAGHAVAN
AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.C.NAIR, DIVYASREE, NEAR TALI TEMPLE, ANGADIPURAM VILLAGE, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 129 days in filing the writ appeal.
Whether the prayer in the underlying writ petition was granted by the impugned judgment.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.V.RAGHAVAN
- respondent
CANARA BANK
- respondent
THE BRANCH MANAGER CANARA BANK PERINTHALMANNA BRANCH
- respondent
MOHAMMAD SIYAD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court