Allowed

P.M..Prabha v. K.G.Ullas

Kerala HC3 Jan 2017Tr.P(C)/434/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a transfer petition filed by the wife of a respondent. The petition sought to transfer O.P.No.1133 of 2015 from Family Court, Mavelikkara to Family Court, Thiruvalla to be tried along with connected matters, citing the petitioner's gender and inconvenience. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

O.P.No.1133 of 2015 on the file of Family Court, Mavelikkara was withdrawn and transferred to the Family Court, Thiruvalla.

P.M..Prabha Vs K.G.Ullas — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2017/13TH POUSHA, 1938

¶5

Tr.P(C).No. 434 of 2016 ()

¶6

TO TRANSFER OP 1133/2015 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA TO FAMILY COURT, THIRVALLA.

¶7

PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

¶8

P.M.PRABHA, AGED 39 YEARS, D/O.LATE PARAMESHWARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT PALATHITTA KAILASAM VEEDU, PADINJATTUM MURI, NEDUMBRAM VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

¶11

1. K.G.ULLAS, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDAN ACHARI, RESIDING AT VETTATHETTHU THEKKETHILAYA AISHWARYA BHAVAN, KUTTAMPEROOR MURI, MANNAR VILLAGE, CHENGANOOR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA.

¶12

2. SHEELA MOHANAN, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.MOHANAN, NOW RESIDING AT VETTATHETTHU THEKKETHILAYA AISHWARYA BHAVAN, KUTTAMPEROOR MURI, MANNAR VILLAGE, CHENGANOOR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA FROM KOLLAMPARAMBIL, PANDANADU PANDINJATTUM MURI, PANDANADU VILLAGE, CHENGANOOR.

¶13

3. MOHANAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O.KOCHUKRISHNAN ACHARI, RESIDING AT VETTATHETTHU THEKKETHILAYA AISHWARYA BHAVAN, KUTTAMPEROOR MURI, MANNAR VILLAGE, CHENGANOOR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA FROM KOLLAMPARAMBIL, PANDANADU PANDINJATTUM MURI, PANDANADU VILLAGE, CHENGANOOR.

¶14

--2--

¶15

--2--

¶16

Tr.P(C).No. 434 of 2016 ()

¶17

4. ABHILASH, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.KOCHUKRISHNAN ACHARI, KOLLAMPARAMBIL, PANDANADU PANDINJATTUM MURI, PANDANADU VILLAGE, CHENGANOOR.

¶18

5. SULOCHANAN @ SULOMONI, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDAN ACHARI, RESIDINT AT PARVATHI SADANAM, VAZHUPADI MURI, THAZHAKKARA VILLAGE, CHENGANOOR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA.

¶19

BY ADV. SRI.LALJI P.THOMAS

¶20

THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

mbr/

¶22

Tr.P(C).No. 434 of 2016 ()

¶23

APPENDIX

¶24

PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:

¶25

ANNEXURE A1 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 4.11.2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN TR.P(C)NO.452 OF 2015, 453 OF 2015, 454 OF 2015 AND 455 OF 2015.

¶26

ANNEXURE A2 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE OP.NO.1133/2015 ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA.

¶27

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL.

//TRUE COPY//

P.S. TO JUDGE

mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

¶32

=========================

¶33

T.P.(C).No.434/2016

¶34

¶35

Dated this the 3^rd day of January, 2017

¶36

O R D E R

¶37

This transfer petition is filed by the wife of the fifth respondent

¶38

seeking relief to transfer O.P.No.1133 of 2015 on the file of the Family

¶39

Court, Mavelikkara to Family Court, Thiruvalla to be tried along with O.P.No.450 of 2015.

¶40

The learned counsel for the respondent did not object the

¶41

prayer of the petitioner.

¶42

Having considered the fact that the petitioner is a woman and

¶43

taking note of the inconvenience she experiences, this court is of the view

¶44

that the transfer petition can be allowed. Accordingly, the transfer petition

¶45

is allowed and O.P.No.1133 of 2015 on the file of the Family Court,

¶46

T.P.(C).No.434/2016

¶47

-:2:-

¶48

Mavelikkara is withdrawn and transferred to the Family Court, Thiruvalla to

¶49

be tried along with connected matters. No costs.

¶50

Sd/-

¶51

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE

¶52

P.M..Prabha v. K.G.Ullas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.M..Prabha v. K.G.Ullas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sree Anjaneya Charitable Trust Vs Sri. Bhanu Pratap Sharma

Suresh Vs State of Kerala

The Principal,N.I.Institute of Eng.Indus Vs the Director of Training

Binu John Vs the District Executive Officer

Remya Vs Jijimon K.G

Vimal Sagar.M Vs Remya.K