Sasi v. a.v.Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
The regular second appeal was dismissed as the matter was settled between the parties and the appeal was withdrawn. No order as to costs was passed.
What did the court decide?
RSA dismissed as withdrawn; all pending interlocutory applications closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/4TH KARTHIKA, 1939
RSA.No. 1143 of 2015 (C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.06.2015 IN AS 26/2014 of SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.01.2014 IN OS 135/2009 of MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
- SASI, AGED 50 YEARS S/O.LATE VELAYUDHAN, RETNERIL HOUSE, CHITTANADU KARA, KUMARAPURAM P.O., KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE.
- SUKU @ SUDHAKRAN, AGED 62 YEARS S/O.LATE VELAYUDHAN, RETNERIL HOUSE, CHITTANADU KARA, KUMARAPURAM P.O., KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE.
- MANI, AGED 61 YEARS W/O.LATE CHANDRAN, RETNERIL HOUSE, CHITTANADU KARA, KUMARAPURAM P.O., KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SASI
- appellant
SUKU @ SUDHAKRAN
- appellant
MANI
- appellant
PREETHA
- appellant
PRIYA
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court