Review petition under WP(C) 19911/2016 challenging dismissal based on alternate remedy under Section 67(1) of Kerala V.A.T. Act, 2003. Court found no error warranting review. Dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/14TH MAGHA, 1938
RP.No. 578 of 2016 (L) IN WP(C).19911/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19911/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC NO.19911/2016:
PREJITH K. BALAKRISHNAN
AGED 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO. XX/386,
VYSHNAVAM, VYRELI NAGAR, VNRA-6, MARKET ROAD, TRIPPUNITHURA, PIN CODE NO. 682301, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.VINCENT RAPHAEL SMT.O.A.NURIYA
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT IN WPC NO. 19911/2016:
BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-022017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
R.P.NO.578 OF 2016 IN W.P.C.No.19911/2016
APPENDIX
REVIEW PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE 1: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPLY OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE ASSESSMENT NOTICE DATED 16.11.2015.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
NIL
TRUE COPY
PA TO JUDGE
**A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J * * * * * * * * * * * *** R.P.No.578 of 2016
in W.P.C.No.19911 of 2016
Dated this the 3rd day of February 2017
O R D E R
This review petition has been filed inter alia stating that there is an error apparent on the face of the judgment.
Hence this review petition is dismissed.
jsr
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prejith K. Balakrishnan
Commercial Tax Officer 2nd Circle, Perumbavoor
State of Kerala
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
