Viswanathan v. Rekha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the regular first appeal (RFA.No. 498 of 2017) as barred by limitation. The court noted it had previously dismissed a condonation of delay application (C.M.Appl. No.510 of 2017) due to an unexplainable delay of 663 days.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/8TH KARTHIKA, 1939
RFA.No. 498 of 2017 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 563/2013 of SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD DATED 25-07-2015
APPELLANT(S)/3RD DEFENDANT:
VISWANATHAN
AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. PERUMBAYIL VENUGOPALAN (LATE), P.O.NADUVILAKKARA, VATANAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SAJEEV
RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS 1, 2 & 4:
- REKHA AGED 42 YEARS, W/O. PERUMBAYIL VIJAYAKRISHNAN, "SREEGRAM' VIDYA NAGAR, P.O.NALLEPPILLY, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 553.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this civil appeal filed after a delay of 663 days should be dismissed as barred by limitation.
Whether the application to condone the delay was allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Viswanathan
- respondent
Rekha
- respondent
Vijayakrishnan
- respondent
Vijayakumar
- respondent
Vivekanandan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court