Arumughan v. Joy Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
The batch appeal arising from a decree for specific performance was disposed of as settled out of court following a settlement agreement dated 25.10.2017 entered by the parties. Court fees were refunded.
What did the court decide?
Case disposed of as settled; court fee refunded in full.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/10TH KARTHIKA, 1939
RFA.No. 230 of 2017 ()
OS 170/2011 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
ARUMUGHAN,S/O.LATE APPUKUTTAN, AGED 64 YEARS,THUMBILAMKADU, KODUNTHIRAPULLY,PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF :
JOY MATHEW, S/O MATHEW, AGED 57 YEARS, NARAMVELIL HOUSE, KODUNTHIRAPULLY,PALAKKAD.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arumughan, S/O. Late Appukuttan
- respondent
Joy Mathew
Coram
P.N. Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court