Dismissed
Tomy Mathew v. Dhanlaxmi Bank
Kerala HCOP (DRT)/123/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1939
OP (DRT).No. 123 of 2017 (O)
IN S.A NO. 118/2017 ON THE FILE OF DRT-2, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER:
TOMY MATHEW, AGED 58, S/O.MATHEW, MADAPALLYMATTOM HOUSE,
MOOZHUR P.O,. KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.SANIL JOSE SRI.NIXON PAUL
RESPONDENT(S):
1. DHANLAXMI BANK, COTTON HILL, VAZHUTHACAUD, TRIVANDRUM -10 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER,
2. DHANALAXMI BANK, AYARKUNNAM BRANCH, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, PIN-686 001
3. MATHEW THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS, M/S.THIRUNILATHIL RUBBER TRADERS, THIRUNILATHIL HOUSE, PADUVA P.O., AYARKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM 686 564.
R1,R2 BY SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN,SC
THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PBS
OP (DRT).No. 123 of 2017 (O)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27/3/2017 IN W.A NO.589/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF IA NO.712/2017 IN S.A NO.118/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 2, ERNAKULAM
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK IN I.A NO.712/2017 IN S.A NO.118/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 2, ERNAKULAM
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
PBS
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
=========================================== O.P.(DRT). No. 123 of 2017(O) ===================================================== Dated this the 1st day of December, 2017
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the OP(DRT) is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
das/ 01.12.2017
TOMY MATHEW
DHANLAXMI BANK
MATHEW THOMAS
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court