the State Bank of India, Karamana branch, Thiruvananthapuram for Rs.3 lakhs payable in favour of the 2nd respondent complainant herein (Sri.S.Nandakumar, Parambu Madom, Nellikkunnam P.O., Pin 691-506) and that the said demand draft has been forwarded to the 2nd respondent complainant by speed post addressed to him. Photocopies of the demand draft, postal receipts, etc. have also been made available for the perusal of this Court. Accordingly, this Court passed order on 7.8.2017 that all further coercive steps for execution of the impugned sentence in this case will stand deferred. It is thereafter that this Court had passed order dated 9.8.2017 directing that notice be issued to R-2 and, as stated herein above, notice has been duly served on that party, but there is no appearance for him. It was specifically directed by this Court as per order dated 9.8.2017 that, in case the 2nd respondent does not enter appearance before this Court and object to the averment of the petitioner that he has already paid the full compensation amount of Rs.3 lakhs directly to the complainant through the abovesaid demand draft dated 5.8.2017, then this Court will be constrained to infer that the said avermentof the petitioner that he has already paid the entire compensation amount directly to the complainant is true and correct.
