Rincy v. Sobhana
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment closes an original petition after allowing the withdrawal of a connected interim application in the subordinate court below, rendering the impugned order redundant. No substantive legal principle is discussed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/16TH POUSHA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1417 of 2016 ()
-------------------------IA.NO.1191/2015 IN OS.NO.111/2007 OF SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA
PETITIONER(S):
1. RINCY, AGED 38 YEARS, D/O SEBASTIAN, VALIKULATH HOUSE, MOOLAMATTOM P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 589
2. LINDA (MINOR),
AGED 14 YEARS, D/O LATE.AVERRELL, VALIKULATH HOUSE, MOOLAMATTOM P.O, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER/NEXT FRIEND, RINCY, AGED 38 YEARS, D/O SEBASTIAN, VALIKULATH HOUSE, MOOLAMATTOM P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 589
BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RINCY
- petitioner
LINDA
- respondent
SOBHANA.M.V.
- respondent
GEORGE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court