The Kerala High Court dismissed the first appeal as barred by limitation after finding that the application to condone the delay was itself rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/16TH KARTHIKA, 1939
FAO.No. 187 of 2015 () -----------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA NO.54/12 IN A.S.NO.80/99 OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-I, KASARAGOD DATD 27.3.2012 O.S.NO.63/1997 OF THE SUB COURT, KASARAGOD.
APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS:
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI SUNILKUMAR KURIAKOSE
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
(DEAD).
R4,R5 BY ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD R4,R5 BY ADV. SMT.MINI V.MENON
THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 07-112017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.N. Ravindran & Devan Ramachandran, JJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -
F.A.O.No.187 of 2015
- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7th November, 2017
JUDGMENT
Devan Ramachandran, J.
We have by order passed today, dismissed C.M.Appl. No.491 of 2015 to condone the delay of 792 days in filing this appeal. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation.
3 (P.N. Ravindran, Judge)
(Devan Ramachandran, Judge)
kav/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the limitation for filing the appeal has been compromised.
State of Kerala Represented by the District Collector, Kasaragod
T.M.Abdulla Kunhi
T.M.Aboobacker
P.N.Ravindran
Devan Ramachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
