The High Court disposed of a civil revision petition against an interim injunction order dismissed by the District Court. It held there was no reason to interfere but directed the inferior court to dispose of the suit within six months.
The Civil Revision Petition was disposed of in order to direct the District Court to dispose of the suit within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/28TH POUSHA 1938
CRP.No. 767 of 2013
C.M.A.NO. 33 OF 2013 OF THE DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT :
GEORGEKUTTY, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.VARGHESE, PULLOLIL HOUSE, MEKOZOOR MURI, MYLAPRA VILLAGE, RANNY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.V.G.ARUN
SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT :
SUDHAKARAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, CHEMMANTHARA, CHARIVUPURAYIDATHIL, MEKOZHOOR MURI, MYLAPRA VILLAGE, RANNY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT- 689 671.
BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
C.R.P. No. 767 of 2013
Dated this the 18th day of January, 2017
O R D E R
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
bka/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim injunction order in the underlying suit requires interference.
Whether the subordinate court is directed to dispose of the suit within a specific time.
GEORGEKUTTY
SUDHAKARAN
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
