K.K.Soman v. P.P.Paily @ Paulose
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the CRP is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2017/3RD MAGHA, 1938
CRP.No. 399 of 2016 ()
E.A.NO.224/2016 IN E.P.NO.151/2013 IN OS.NO.649/2004 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/CLAIM PETITIONER:
K.K.SOMAN, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. LATE KUNJAYAPPAN, KONTHURUTHIYIL, EROOR, NOW RESIDING AT MANAMEL HOUSE, NEAR PIZHARI KOVIL, EROOR P.O.
BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER:
P.P.PAILY @ PAULOSE, S/O. LATE PATHROSE, NO.32/185, PARAVARA HOUSE, PALLIMITTAM, EROOR P.O., PIN-682 306.
BY SRI.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
C.R.P. No. 399 of 2016
Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2017
O R D E R
The petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the CRP with liberty to file an appeal. Permission is granted
and the CRP is dismissed as withdrawn.
Registry shall return the certified copy produced by the petitioner.
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
bka/-
K.K.Soman
P.P.Paily @ Paulose
A.Muhammed Mustaque
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court