cheque amount of Rs.1,00,000/- before the trial court, then he should be permitted to execute the bond with two solvent sureties each in terms of this Court’s earlier interim order and on such grant of bail, he shall be released on bail. It is now reported that the petitioner has deposited the said cheque amount of Rs.1,00,000/- before the trial court and that he has been released from jail pursuant to the directions issued by this Court on 22.5.2017. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner had actually suffered simple imprisonment for seven days in execution of the impugned sentence in this case. Though the cheque amount was for Rs.1,00,000/-, the trial court has imposed only a fine of Rs.5,000/- and there are no directions in the judgment of the trial court that the said fine amount shall be disbursed to the complainant as compensation under 357(1)(b) of the Cr.P.C. and as stated herein above, this direction has been confirmed by the impugned appellate court judgment. But the first respondent/ complainant has not bothered to file any revision praying that the fine amount may be enhanced and that the same may be disbursed to the complainant as compensation in terms of Section 357(1) (b) of the Cr.P.C. Therefore, it appears that the first respondent is fully satisfied with the conviction in the impugned judgment that the fine amount could
