Nidhin Sha v. Amina
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court allowed two criminal miscellaneous cases and quashed the respective FIRs. The offenses arose from matrimonial disputes which were subsequently resolved between the parties through settlement, leaving no larger public importance issue.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Miscellaneous Cases 7146/2017 and 7348/2017 allowed; FIRs in Crime Nos. 867/2017 and 459/2017 quashed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/12TH KARTHIKA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 7146 of 2017 ()
CRIME NO. 867/2017 OF NORTH PARUR POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
1. NIDHIN SHA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMAD,IYINIKKA VEEDU, MANNAM, NORTH PARUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683 520.
2. ABDUL NIZAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O. P.K. ALI, PEREPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNAM, NORTH PARUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 520.
BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT, INJURED & COMPLAINANT:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nidhin Sha and Abdul Nizar
- respondent
Amina, Hamsa, Afna
- respondent
State of Kerala, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court