Shinil.C.Jabbar v. Noufa
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court permitted quashing of FIR and final report under Section 376 IPC where parties settled and complainant affirmed consensual sexual intercourse and lack of grievance.
What did the court decide?
Quashment of the final report and further proceedings against the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/27TH SRAVANA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 4707 of 2017 ()
CP 1/2017 of J.M.F.C. - IX, ERNAKULAM (TEMPORARY) CRIME NO. 894/2016 OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SHINIL.C.JABBAR,
AGED 29 YEARS,S/O JABBAR,CHATHANKULANGARA HOUSE, MEPPADAM DESOM,CHELAKKARA,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.IEANS.C.CHAMAKKALA
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE:
- NOUFA, AGED 29 YEARS,D/O MAHEEN,PUTHUVALPUTHENPURA HOUSE, KADAKAMPILLY VILLAGE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FCRA can be exercised to quash proceedings under Section 376 IPC where the complainant has filed a settlement affidavit stating consent and no grievance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shinil.C.Jabbar
- respondent
Noufa
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court