Partly allowed

Krishnankutty v. Bhavani

Kerala HC11 Aug 2017Crl.MC/3989/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala quashed an interim order passed by the Additional Sessions Court, Thrissur, in a criminal appeal, directing the learned Judge to dispose of the appeal within two months. Until disposal, the lower court's order is kept in abeyance.

What did the court decide?

Quashed interim order in Crl. Appeal No.67/2017; Directed disposal within two months; Attached order kept in abeyance.

Krishnankutty Vs Bhavani — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Kerala HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/20TH SRAVANA, 1939

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 3989 of 2017 ()

¶6

--------------------------C.M.P.NO.1106/2017 IN CRL.NO.67/2017 OF THE COURT OF THE IVTH ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, THRISSUR CRL.M.P.NO.5470(A)/2015 IN M.C.NO.70/2015 OF THE JFMC-III, THRISSUR

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

¶8

KRISHNANKUTTY

¶9

AGED 76 YEARS, S/O.SANKARAN, MADAMBIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MANNAMANGALAM DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK.

¶10

BY ADVS.SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.)

¶11

SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN

¶12

SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN

¶13

RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER/PETITIONER & STATE:

¶14

1. BHAVANI AGED 68 YEARS, W/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, MADAMBIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MANNAMANGALAM DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK.

¶15

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

¶16

R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.B.GANGESH R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.K.PRASAD

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-08-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

Crl.MC.No. 3989 of 2017 ()

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶21

ANNEXUER-A:	TRUE COPY OF THE M.C.NO.70/2015 PREFERRED BY THE IST RESPONDENT HEREIN, PENDING ON THE FILES OF THE COURT OF THE JUICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS- III, THRISSUR
ANNEXUER-B:	TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION, PREFERRED BY THE IST RESPONDENT HEREIN, AS M.P.NO.5470(a)/2015 IN M.C.NO.70/2015, DATED 13.02.2017, BEFORE THE COURT OF THE JFMC-III, THRISSUR
ANNEXUER-C:	TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS PREFERRED BY THE PETITONER HEREIN AGAINST ANNEXURE-B
ANNEXUER-D:	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.02.2017 IN CRL.M.P.NO.5470(a)/2015 IN M.C.NO.70/2015 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-III, THRISSUR
ANNEXUER-E:	TRUE COPY OF THE CRIMINAL APPEAL PREFERRED AS CRL.A.NO.67/2017, IMPUGNING ANNEXURE-D, BY THE IST RESPONDENT HEREIN, BEFORE THE IVTH ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, THRISSUR.
ANNEXUER-F:	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.03.2017, IN CRL.M.P.NO.1106/2017 IN CRL.NO.67/2017 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE IVTH ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE THRISSUR.
ANNEXUER-G:	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.04.2017 IN CRL.M.C.NO.2564/2017, PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.
ANNEXUER-H:	TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION PREFERRED BY THE PETIITONER HEREIN, TO CRL.M.P.NO.1106/2017 IN CRL.A.67/2017 BEFORE THE IVTH ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, THRISSUR.
ANNEXUER-I:	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.05.2017 IN CRL.M.P.NO.1106/2017 IN CRL.A.NO.67/2017 BEFORE THE IVTH ADDITIPONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, THRISSUR.

¶22

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

STK

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

¶27

--------------------------------

¶28

Crl.M.C. No.3989 of 2017

¶29

Dated this the 11^th day of August, 2017

¶30

O R D E R

¶31

The interim order passed by the Additional Sessions Court, Thrissur in C.M.P.No.1106/2017 in Crl. Appeal

¶32

No.67/2017 is under challenge in this Crl.M.C.

¶33

Crl. Appeal No.67/2017 is ripe for trial. Therefore,

¶34

the learned Sessions Judge is directed to dispose of Crl. Appeal No.67/2017 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the court below.

¶35

Till the disposal of Crl. Appeal No.67/2017, Annexure-I order will be kept in abeyance.

¶36

In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands disposed of as above.

¶37

Sd/-

¶38

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE

¶39

STK

¶40

//TRUE COPY//

¶41

//P.A. TO JUDGE//

Krishnankutty v. Bhavani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnankutty v. Bhavani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Afsath Vs State of Kerala

Ratheesh Vs State of Kerala

Jiju Vs Lima.B

Prajith.M.R Vs State of Kerala

Balan Vs State of Kerala

Saiby Antony Vs State of Kerala