P.S. Thomas v. Sree Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt matter regarding construction in violation of a prior judgment, the court observed that disputed questions of fact regarding the nature of construction precluded further proceedings. The contempt case was closed, leaving parties' rights open for appropriate proceedings. No dismissal order is explicitly stated in the text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/15TH CHAITHRA, 1939 Con.Case(C).No. 307 of 2016 (S)
-------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35952/2015 DATED 8-01-2016
----------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WPC: ---------------------------------
P.S. THOMAS,AGED 80 YEARS, S/O SKARIA, PARAPPALLI, PANDANKARI MURI, EDATHUA VILLAGE, KUTTANAND TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN SRI.GEORGE MATHEW SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G SRI.DIPU JAMES
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 4 & 6 TO 9:
1. SREE KUMAR, (AGE & NAME OF FATHER NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, EDATHUA-689573
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be initiated against the third respondent for violating court directions regarding property construction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.S. Thomas
- respondent
Sree Kumar
- respondent
Ullas Kumar
- respondent
Raju
- respondent
Sajeiv
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court