This is a contempt of court case where the respondent affirmed compliance with previous directions in a writ petition. The court accepted the submission and closed the contempt proceedings.
Contempt proceedings closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/15TH POUSHA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 2127 of 2016 (S)
---------------------------------------------THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 26534/2016 DATED 28-09-2016.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
NITHIN THOMAS, S/O. THOMAS MATHEW (LATE), AGED 26 YEARS, MUNDAPLAKKAL HOUSE, MADAMON. P.O, PERUNAD, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 711.
BY ADVS.SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN, SMT.RESMI G. NAIR.
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
AJITHA. B.,
AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, PERINAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH, RANNI, PERUNAD, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 711.
BY ADV. SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
Con.Case(C).No. 2127 of 2016 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
ANNEXURE A COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL DATED 19/04/2016 OF LICENSE FOR THE PERIOD 2016-17. ANNEXURE B CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28/09/2016 IN WP(C).NO.26534/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE C COPY OF THE NOTICE VIDE NO.4772/16 DATED 22/10/2016 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
rs.
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
Cont. Case (C) No.2127 of 2016
in
W.P(C) No.26534 of 2016
Dated this the 05th day of January, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the respondent
Panchayath submits that the directions in the judgment in W.P(C) No.26534/2016 have been complied with and orders
issued on 24.12.2016. In such circumstance, the order shall be
communicated to the petitioner expeditiously and the petitioner is left with the liberty to approach the appropriate authority if it is prejudicial. Contempt case would stand
closed.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge
jma
//true copy//
P.A to Judge
NITHIN THOMAS
PERINAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH
K VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
