M.I.Luvis v. M.K.Kabeer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a compliance petition in a contempt case, asserting adherence to the earlier court direction; court found compliance and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings closed in compliance with the earlier direction.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/19TH KARTHIKA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1970 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12755/2017 DATED 05-06-2017 ----------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
M.I.LUVIS, S/O. IPE, MENACHERI HOUSE, NAYATHODE P.O, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
M.K.KABEER, AGED AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI RAVI KRISHNAN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.I.LUVIS
- respondent
M.K.KABEER
Coram
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court