K.Krishnan v. B.N.Nagarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala closed a contempt of court case alleging breach of interim order directions. The court held the case could not be maintained because the named respondents were not the ones who received the original directions in the underlying writ petition interim order.
What did the court decide?
The contempt of court case is closed as it is not maintainable against the named respondents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/21ST ASWINA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1786 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).4817/2015
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 4817/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DATED 12.4.2017.
------------------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):
K.KRISHNAN, AGED 69 YEARS, S/O.P.KUTTAN, NIRMALA BHAVAN, BANGALAVU THARA, MANKULAM P.O.,IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685565, SECRETARY, SAHYA HARITHA SANGHAM, REG. NO.I-286/99, MANKULAM P.O.
BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt of court case is maintainable against the respondents shown as respondents in the contempt petition who were not the respondents in the underlying interim order application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Krishnan
- respondent
B.N.Nagarajan
- respondent
Pious
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court