In this bail application regarding apprehension of arrest for cheque issuance, the Court found no foundation for the petitioner's fear as no case had been registered, leading to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/4TH MAGHA, 1938
Bail Appl..No. 100 of 2017 ()
-----------------------------CRIME NUMBER NOT KNOWN OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
BAIJU C.ANDREWS, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.C.V. ANDRAYOSE, CHERKONIL HOUSE, PAMPADY KARA, PAMPADY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RANJIT (KOTTAYAM).
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SAJJU. S.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
B.A.No.100 of 2017
Dated this the 24th day of January, 2017
ORDER
The petitioner apprehends that he will be arrested by the Central Police, Ernakulam in connection with issuance of a cheque.
been registered against the petitioner and his apprehension is not reasonable.
apprehension of the petitioner.
In the result, this application is dismissed.
Sd/-
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE
ln
/True copy/
P.A. to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has reasonable apprehension of arrest in connection with the issuance of a cheque.
BAIJU C.ANDREWS
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
