Vijayan v. K.v.Chandran
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed an appeal by the appellant Vitally for being barred due to the efflux of time, as no steps were taken within the self-working time limit of the previous order.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for being barred by time.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2013/29TH PHALGUNA 1934
AS.No. 755 of 1999 (C)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS.58/1997 of SUB COURT,KATTAPPANA DATED 24-11-1998
APPELLANT(S)/DEFENDANT:
VIJAYAN, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O VASU, KIZHAKKEMADATHIL, VEETTIL, SANNYASIODA KARA, PAMPADUMPARA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.RAINGE KODUVATH
SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT(S):
1. K.V. CHANDRAN, AGED 37, S/O KUNJUKRISHNAN, VADAKKKONIL VEETTIL, NEDUMKANDAM KARA, KALKOONTHAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, (PLAINTIF)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vijayan
- respondent
K.V. Chandran
- respondent
Sambasivan
- respondent
A.V. Ravi
- respondent
Radamma Ravi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court