This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2017/1ST JYAISHTA, 1939
AS.No. 667 of 2001 (B)
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 342/1994 of ADDL.SUB COURT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 19-03-2001
APPELLANT(S): DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2
BY ADVS.SRI.T.B.THANKAPPAN
SRI.V.P. RAMESAN
SMT.K.DEEPA
SRI.VARGHESE POTHAN
RESPONDENT(S): PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDATNS 3 TO 5:
(The additional respondents 5 and 6 are impleaded vide order dated 17.7.2002 in CMP.No.2585/2002.)
R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-05-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH & SATHISH NINAN, JJ.
A.S.No.667 of 2001
Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2017
J U D G M E N T
Chitambaresh, J.
Counsel reports no instructions. Names called.
Absent.
The Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN, JUDGE
nj/23.05.2017
//True copy//
P.S. to Judge.
M/S. UNITED COUNSTRUCTIONS COMPANY
C.P. THOMAS
MARIAMMA
K.V. VARGHESE
K.A. SAMUEL
ANNAMMA POULOSE
V. CHITAMBARESH
SATHISH NINAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
