P6 resolutions decided to entrust the matter of measurement of the works done to an Assistant Engineer. Inasmuch as Exts.P5 and P6 resolutions are seen taken subsequent to the date of Ext.P3 demand notice that was served on the petitioner under the Revenue Recovery Act, it is apparent that, it was pursuant to the representation preferred by the petitioner before the District Collector, that the respondent Panchayath decided to have a fresh determination as to whether there were any amounts due from the petitioner after conducting a measurement of the works already done by the petitioner. Although the petitioner has, in the writ petition, produced Ext.P7 measurement sheet that is seen prepared in the year 2000, the said measurement sheet cannot be taken as one that was prepared pursuant to Exts.P5 and P6 resolutions since the latter resolutions are dated 29.09.2003 and 01.10.2003 respectively. At any rate, it is apparent that, there was an exercise undertaken by the respondent Panchayath to determine the extent and value of the work that was done by the petitioner so as to determine whether there was any amount that had to be refunded by the petitioner to the respondent Panchayath or alternatively, whether there was any amount that remained to be paid to the petitioner by the Panchayath. In the writ petition,
