Padmini Chindan v. the District Collector,Kasaragod
Case brief
What is this about?
This order notes that the writ petition was not pressed during the hearing. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2016/11TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 8942 of 2011 (P)
PETITIONER :
SMT. PADMINI CHINDAN
AGED 52 YEARS, W/O. V. CHINDAN, RESIDING AT PROMOD NIWAS, KARIKKAT, BARA VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE
SMT.CISSY MATHEWS
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARGODE, VIDYANAGAR P.O., KASARGODE DISTRICT- 671 123.
2. THE SECRETARY, PALLIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
BEKAL FORT P.O., KASARGODE DISTRICT-671 121.
3. THE TAHASILDAR, HOSDURG (LAND ASSIGNMENT), KANHANGAD P.O., KASARGODE DISTRICT-671 121.
R1 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.S. SAJEEV
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
P.V.ASHA J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.8942 of 2011
---------------------------------------------
Dated this the 1st day of June, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the writ petition is not pressed. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
/True Copy/
P.A. to Judge
AS/01/06/16
SMT. PADMINI CHINDAN
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARGODE
THE SECRETARY, PALLIKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH
THE TAHASILDAR, HOSDURG
P.V. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court