The High Court of Kerala dismissed W.P.C. No. 8812 of 2015 filed by Bank of Baroda without assigning detailed reasons, holding that the writ petition had become infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/13TH ASWINA, 1938
WP(C).No. 8812 of 2015 (B)
PETITIONER:
BANK OF BARODA, ERNAKULAM MAIN BRANCH, MG ROAD, PALLIMUKKU, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.M.ANEESH SRI.ADARSH KUMAR SRI.BIJU VARGHESE ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM.
2. THE TAHSILDAR (RR), KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM.
3. M/S.ONLINE IT SHOPPE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, ONLINE IT TOWER, RAVIPURAM, ERNAKULAM 682016.
4. MR. SHYJU ANTONY,
*** ADDL R5 IMPLEADED**
5. L.T.CDR.JOSEPH VILANGADAN, VILANGADAN HOUSE,LBS ROAD,
R1,R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI V.K.SHAMSHUDEEN RADDL.5 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.V.
WP(C).No. 8812 of 2015 (B)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
K.V.
**A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J * * * * * * * * * * * *** W.P.C.No.8812 of 2015
Dated this the 5th day of October 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous.
Hence this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(sd/-)
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
jsr
Bank of Baroda, Ernakulam Main Branch
The District Collector, Ernakulam
The Tahsildar (RR), Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam
M/s. Online It Shoppe India Private Limited
Mr. Shyju Antony
L.T.Cdr. Joseph Vilangadan
A.M. Shaaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
