T.J. Mathew v. Intelligence Officer (Ib)
Case brief
What is this about?
This one-line order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous. The court recorded no substantive reasoning or facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2016/31ST JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 654 of 2012 (F)
PETITIONER(S):
T.J. MATHEW,
EX-PROPRIETOR, NEW EXCEL CAR GAS, CHUNGAM, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB), IDUKKI AT THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 613.
2. THE DY. COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOTTAYAM AT ERNAKULAM-682 015.
3. TAHSILDAR (RR),
4. SABU T.JOSE, S/O.JOSEPH, THENAMMACKAL, PANNIAMATTOM, P.O. VELLIYAMATTOM, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 588.
R1-R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LILLY K.T.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
msv/
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
=============
W.P. (C) No. 654 of 2012
===================
Dated this, the 21st day of June, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
Rp21/06/2016
//True Copy//
P.S to Judge
T.J. Mathew
Intelligence Officer (IB), Idukki
The Dy. Commissioner (Appeals), Commercial Taxes, Kottayam
Tahsildar (RR), Thodupuzha
Sabu T. Jose
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court