Dismissed
Sheejamol v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/6277/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/19TH SRAVANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 6277 of 2016 (H)
PETITIONER:
SHEEJAMOL, AGED 41 YEARS, D/O. BABY MATHEW @ MARY ROSILY, PROPRIETRESS, KOTTAVATHIL RESTAURANT, THRIPUNITHURA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT,
GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, ERNAKULAM-682 018.
BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-08-2016, ALONG WITH WPC.NO. 6283/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
W.P.(C). Nos.6277, 6283, 6353
6357 and 6360 of 2016
Dated this the 10th day of August, 2016
JUDGMENT
Aforesaid writ petitions are filed by the petitioners seeking refund of the proportionate licence fee with 6% interest per annum as directed in Ext.P2 judgment referred to in W.P.(C) No.6353/2016.
Therefore, writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous
recording that petitioners have received the amounts claimed in the writ petition.
Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
//true copy//
P.A. To Judge
smv 10.08.2016
Sheejamol
State of Kerala
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court