Disposed
T.Rathish v. Kerala State Electricity Board
Kerala HCWP(C)/6029/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2016/3RD JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 6029 of 2013 (C)
PETITIONER(S):
T.RATHISH S/O.BALAKRISHNAN, PROPRIETOR, 'SAGI LADIES DRESS MAKERS', EDAKKARA, EDAKKARA.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENT(S): --------------
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SMT.P.K.RADHIKA-KSEB BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 6029 of 2013 (C)
APPENDIX
| PETIT | IONER(S) EXHIBITS |
|---|---|
| P1- | TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 4.12.2004 ENTERED BY THE PETITIONER WITH DIVAKARAN. |
| P2- | TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.199/2009 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI. |
| P3- | TRUE COPY OF THE I.A.NO.906/2009 IN O.S.199/2009 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI. |
| P4- | TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN O.S.199/2009 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI. |
| P5- | TRUE COPY OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT IN O.S.199/2009 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI WITH ROUGH SKETCH. |
| P6- | TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 5.12.2012 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. |
| P7- | TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD ATTACHED TO EXT.P6 REPRESENTATION. |
| P8- | TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT DATED 5.12.2012. |
| P9- | TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO EXT.P8 DATED 13.12.2012. |
| P10- | TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. |
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(A): A COPY OF RELEVANT PAGE OF THE READING REGISTER
EXT.R1(B): COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION, EDAKKARA.
//True copy//
P.A. to Judge
ds
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the action of the second respondent in disconnecting the electricity supply to consumer No. 7394-E (7394-5), which is a shop room taken on lease by the petitioner.
W.P.(C) No. 6029 of 2013
-2-
power connection to the petitioner.
thereafter he is continuing in the said premises even now and is paying regular current charges.
power connection without notice to the occupants. Insofar as the power has already been reconnected, I do not think that any further direction is required in the matter. Parties are directed to maintain the status quo as long as the petitioner remits the bill amount in time.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE
ds
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Assistant Engineer was proper in disconnecting electricity supply without prior notice to the occupants.
T.RATHISH
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION K.S.E.B
MUHAMMEDALI
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court