The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as having become infructuous, as submitted by the counsel for the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/8TH ASHADHA, 1938
WP(C).No. 5991 of 2010 (Y)
PETITIONER(S):
MR.MUHAMMED ASHRAF, S/O. MAMMU HAJI, AGED 37 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, KUTTIPPURAM SAWMILL, PEECHAMKODE, KELLOOR, WAYANAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER,
2. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NORTH WAYANAD, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS & WILD LIFE, WAYANAD.
3. THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (VIGILANCE), FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS & WILDLIFE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. ABHIJITH LESSLI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-06-2016,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
P.V.ASHA, J.
W.P.(C) No.5991 of 2010
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition
has become infructuous. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/- P.V.ASHA JUDGE
rkc
True copy
PA to Judge
MR.MUHAMMED ASHRAF
WHOMSOEVER SUES
P.V.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
